Improving participation in history learning through the MIKIR strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic at SMA Negeri 1 Pasie Raja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47239/d0cbxw54Keywords:
MIKIR, history learning, student participation, classroom action research, emergency remote learningAbstract
School closures during the COVID-19 pandemic created barriers to participation in history learning, particularly for students with limited access to smartphones and reliable internet connections. This study examined participation and achievement following the implementation of a locally defined MIKIR (Indonesia / Melaksanakan pembelajaran daring dan luring, Konstektual dan berdaya guna, Intens melakukan refleksi dan Relevan dengan kemampuan Orangtua dan siswa) strategy at SMA Negeri 1 Pasie Raja, South Aceh Regency, Indonesia. MIKIR combined online and offline instruction, contextual and useful learning activities, frequent reflection, and adaptation to students’ and parents’ circumstances. Classroom action research involved 22 students in Grade XI social sciences, comprising 15 girls and seven boys, and consisted of two cycles with two meetings per cycle. Online learning used a teacher-managed blog and WhatsApp, while offline learning used printed worksheets and the school’s 4M (Indonesia/membagi kelompok, mengantar tugas, monitoring dan menjemput/) delivery, monitoring, and collection arrangement. Assignment records, observations, reflection forms, and achievement summaries provided descriptive evidence. On-time participation increased from eight students at the second meeting of Cycle I to 20 students at the second meeting of Cycle II, equivalent to an increase from 36.36% to 90.91%. Late participation decreased from ten to two students. At the final meeting, 20 of 22 students achieved the minimum mastery score of 75. The reported meeting means increased from 57.11 and 66.45 in Cycle I to 83.05 and 84.70 in Cycle II. Inconsistent cycle averages and dates in the source records require verification. The findings suggest that coordinated access arrangements, clearer instructions, and reflection supported participation in this class; the design does not establish causality or generalizability.
References
Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 920317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317
Al Mazrooei, A. K., Almaki, S. H., Gunda, M., Alnoor, A., & Sulaiman, S. M. (2022). A systematic review of K–12 education responses to emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Review of Education, 68(6), 811–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-023-09986-w
Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2024). Educational technology and digital learning in the post-pandemic era: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 12015–12042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12345-6
Amemasor, S. K., Oppong, S. O., Ghansah, B., Benuwa, B.-B., & Essel, D. D. (2025). A systematic review on the impact of teacher professional development on digital instructional integration and teaching practices. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1541031. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Elisya Sovia (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



