Using PhET simulations to improve grade XII students’ understanding of electrostatics during the COVID-19 pandemic at SMA Negeri 2 Donggo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47239/0z3qj359Keywords:
PhET Interactive Simulations, electrostatics, conceptual understanding, physics education, COVID-19 pandemicAbstract
Electrostatics requires students to interpret processes that are difficult to observe directly, while limited laboratory equipment and pandemic-related disruption can restrict opportunities for investigation. This study examined changes in conceptual understanding, lesson implementation, and student responses following the use of PhET simulations at SMA Negeri 2 Donggo, Bima Regency, Indonesia. A single-group before-and-after classroom intervention involved 32 Grade XII science students during the first semester of the 2020/2021 academic year. Although described as experimental in the original manuscript, the reported design included neither random assignment nor a comparison group. Data were obtained through learning-process observations, worksheets, concept assessments, and student response forms. The mean concept score increased from 68.20 to 74.06, a gain of 5.86 score points. The number of students meeting the school’s mastery criterion increased from 22 to 28, corresponding to 68.75% and 87.50%, or an increase of 18.75 percentage points. The minimum score increased from 41.18 to 55.00, while the maximum increased from 82.35 to 90.00. Lesson implementation received 38.5 of 44 possible points, an index of 87.50%. The response table reported 180 of 210 possible points, an index of 85.71%, but inconsistent respondent counts require verification. The findings indicate improved recorded achievement and favorable classroom responses following simulation-supported instruction. Because individual assessment data, instrument details, and a control condition were unavailable, the results support a classroom description rather than a causal estimate of PhET effectiveness.
References
Agarwal, P. K., Nunes, L. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2021). Retrieval practice consistently benefits student learning: A systematic review of applied research in schools and classrooms. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1409–1453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09595-9
Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 920317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317
Al Mazrooei, A. K., Almaki, S. H., Gunda, M., Alnoor, A., & Sulaiman, S. M. (2022). A systematic review of K–12 education responses to emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Review of Education, 68(6), 811–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-023-09986-w
Amemasor, S. K., Oppong, S. O., Ghansah, B., Benuwa, B.-B., & Essel, D. D. (2025). A systematic review on the impact of teacher professional development on digital instructional integration and teaching practices. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1541031. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031
Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Hische, C., Loose, F., & Scheiter, K. (2020). Professional knowledge or motivation? Investigating the role of teachers’ expertise on the quality of technology-enhanced lesson plans. Learning and Instruction, 66, Article 101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101300
Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2021). Effect of integrating physics education technology simulations on students’ conceptual understanding in physics: A review of literature. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), Article 023108. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.17.023108
Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2023). The impact of physics education technology (PhET) interactive simulation-based learning on motivation and academic achievement among Malawian physics students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10010-3
Ben Ouahi, M., Lamri, D., Hassouni, T., & Al Ibrahmi, E. M. (2022). Science teachers' views on the use and effectiveness of interactive simulations in science teaching and learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15116a
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2024). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00445-2
Brod, G. (2021). Generative learning: Which strategies for what age? Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1295–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09571-9
Bureau, J. S., Howard, J. L., Chong, J. X. Y., & Guay, F. (2022). Pathways to student motivation: A meta-analysis of antecedents of autonomous and controlled motivations. Review of Educational Research, 92(1), 46–72. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211042426
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Soekarman man (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



