Fashion Week as Joyful Learning for Camera Shot Techniques in Vocational Multimedia Education

Miftahul Jannah

doi:10.47239/haj82765

Authors

Miftahul Jannah SMK Unggul Negeri 2 Banyuasin III, South Sumatra, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47239/haj82765

Keywords:

fashion week, joyful learning, camera shot techniques, multimedia, vocational education

Abstract

This study explored a Fashion Week-inspired learning concept for teaching camera shot techniques to Grade XI Multimedia students at SMK Unggul Negeri 2 Banyuasin III. Students were divided into model and photographer groups and participated in an authentic photography activity designed to move technical learning beyond the classroom. A qualitative approach was supported by interviews and a non-test Likert-scale questionnaire addressing enjoyment, application of content, evaluation, and presentation of the learning design. Students reported strong enthusiasm, reduced monotony, greater confidence, and positive perceptions of applying shot-size concepts in practice. The study illustrates how a culturally salient event can be repurposed as contextual vocational learning. Because the source does not report a comparison group or pre–post technical performance scores, the findings support claims about student response and engagement rather than causal improvement in photography competence.

Abstract Views: 0PDF Downloads: 3

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.

CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. CAST.

Cook, B. G., & Odom, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79(2), 135–144.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125–139.

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261–292.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2018). Evidence-based writing practices: A meta-analysis of existing meta-analyses. In Design Principles for Teaching Effective Writing.

Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford Press.

Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–19.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 111(23), 8410–8415.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.

Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.

Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509–539.

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686.

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832.

Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202–209.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.

Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828.

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16.

Mitchell, D. (2014). What really works in special and inclusive education. Routledge.

Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 392–408.

Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A. A., & Wakeman, S. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74(4), 407–432.

Hughes, C., & Agran, M. (1993). Teaching persons with severe disabilities to use self-instruction in community-based settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18(4), 261–268.

Spooner, F., Knight, V. F., Browder, D. M., & Smith, B. R. (2012). Evidence-based practice for teaching academics to students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33(6), 374–387.

Marschark, M., & Hauser, P. C. (2012). How deaf children learn. Oxford University Press.

Marschark, M., Shaver, D. M., Nagle, K. M., & Newman, L. A. (2015). Predicting the academic achievement of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 20(3), 229–245.

Qi, S., & Mitchell, R. E. (2012). Large-scale academic achievement testing of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(1), 1–18.

Luckner, J. L., & Cooke, C. (2010). A summary of the vocabulary research with students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 155(1), 38–67.

Guardino, C., & Cannon, J. E. (2015). Theory, research, and practice for students who are deaf and hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 160(4), 347–355.

Cihak, D. F., Fahrenkrog, C., Ayres, K. M., & Smith, C. (2010). The use of video modeling via a video iPod and a system of least prompts. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12(2), 103–115.

Ayres, K. M., Mechling, L., & Sansosti, F. J. (2013). The use of mobile technologies to assist with life skills/independence of students with moderate/severe intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(2), 259–271.

Mechling, L. C. (2007). Assistive technology as a self-management tool for prompting students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42(3), 252–269.

Bouck, E. C. (2010). Reports of life skills training for students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(3), 386–399.

Alquraini, T., & Gut, D. (2012). Critical components of successful inclusion of students with severe disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 42–59.

Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Hattie, J. (2016). Visible learning for literacy. Corwin.

Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., & Cascallar, E. (2011). The direct and indirect effect of motivation for learning on students’ approaches to learning through the perceptions of workload and task complexity. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 135–150.

Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175.

Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600.

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525.

Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327–365.

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Adaptive motivation and emotion in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 228–236.

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.

Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. Routledge.