Using Busy Book Learning Media to Improve Fine Motor Skills of Students with Intellectual Disabilities

Authors

  • Trisna Yulianto SLB Negeri Purbalingga, Central Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47239/hd7bhx44

Keywords:

busy book, fine motor skills, intellectual disability, classroom action research, special education

Abstract

This classroom action research examined the use of a busy book to improve fine motor skills of two Grade VII C1 students with intellectual disabilities at SLB Negeri Purbalingga. The Kemmis–McTaggart cycle of planning, action, observation, and reflection was implemented in two cycles. Performance tests and structured observations assessed grasping, holding, pinching, folding, stringing, twisting, dressing-related manipulation, and other fine-motor actions. Baseline scores were 31.94 for AL and 27.77 for FH. After Cycle I, scores increased to 41.66 and 38.88. By Cycle II, both students had reached the study success criterion; the manuscript reports total gains of 44.44 percentage points for AL and 43.06 for FH. The findings indicate that repeated, concrete manipulation of buttons, zippers, laces, and other tactile components within the busy book was accompanied by meaningful within-student improvement. Because the study involved only two participants and no comparison condition, the findings should be interpreted as classroom-based evidence rather than causal proof.

Abstract Views: 9PDF Downloads: 14

References

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16.

Alquraini, T., & Gut, D. (2012). Critical components of successful inclusion of students with severe disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 42–59.

Ayres, K. M., Mechling, L., & Sansosti, F. J. (2013). The use of mobile technologies to assist with life skills/independence of students with moderate/severe intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(2), 259–271.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.

Bouck, E. C. (2010). Reports of life skills training for students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(3), 386–399.

Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A. A., & Wakeman, S. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74(4), 407–432.

Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 392–408.

Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.

Cihak, D. F., Fahrenkrog, C., Ayres, K. M., & Smith, C. (2010). The use of video modeling via a video iPod and a system of least prompts. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12(2), 103–115.

Cook, B. G., & Odom, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79(2), 135–144.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58.

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.

Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 111(23), 8410–8415.

Handika, E. A., & Rocmah, L. I. (2025). Busy book media improves fine motor skills in early childhood. Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijemd.v20i3.932

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.

Hughes, C., & Agran, M. (1993). Teaching persons with severe disabilities to use self-instruction in community-based settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18(4), 261–268.

Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600.

Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509–539.

Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., & Cascallar, E. (2011). The direct and indirect effect of motivation for learning on students’ approaches to learning through the perceptions of workload and task complexity. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 135–150.

Lestari, A. B., Komala, & Jumiatin, D. (2026). Efektivitas penggunaan media busy book untuk meningkatkan kemampuan motorik halus anak usia dini. CERIA, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.22460/ceria.v9i2.31119

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Adaptive motivation and emotion in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 228–236.

Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327–365.

Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125–139.

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.

Mechling, L. C. (2007). Assistive technology as a self-management tool for prompting students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42(3), 252–269.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326.

Nazara, W., & Tegeh, I. M. (2023). Busy book media based on a contextual approach in improving fine motor skills in early childhood. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha, 11(2), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.23887/paud.v11i2.64154

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.

Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.

Purnamasari, Y., Putri, Y. E., & Vega, A. D. (2026). The effectiveness of busy book media on fine motor skills of 4–5 year old children at KB Ainul Husna, Padang Panjang City. Suluah Pasaman, 4(1), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.70588/suluahpasaman.v4i1.1154

Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175.

Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–19.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832.

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525.

Spooner, F., Knight, V. F., Browder, D. M., & Smith, B. R. (2012). Evidence-based practice for teaching academics to students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33(6), 374–387.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261–292.

Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202–209.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Yulianto, T. (2025). Using Busy Book Learning Media to Improve Fine Motor Skills of Students with Intellectual Disabilities. Jurnal Guru Dikmen Diksus, 8(2), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.47239/hd7bhx44
1-10 of 87

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.